USGS Western Ecological Research Center

Home Who We Are Where We Are What We Do Products Search Outreach Jobs Contacts

Prescribed fires do not reduce future area burned in central and southern California

Released: 2012
Citation:
WERC Publication Brief: Prescribed fires do not reduce future area burned in central and southern California. Updated November 2012.

THIS BRIEF REFERS TO:
Price, OF, RA Bradstock, JE Keeley, AD Syphard. 2012. The impact of antecedent fire area on burned area in southern California coastal ecosystems. Journal of Environmental Management 113: 301-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.042

Frequent wildfire disasters in central and southern California highlight the need for fire risk reduction strategies for the region. Fuel reduction via prescribed burning is one commonly discussed option, yet there is no consensus about the effectiveness of prescribed fire in reducing the area of future wildfire. 

A new statistical analysis of historic fires reveals that in central and southern California ecosystems, prescribed fires have no effect on reducing area burned by future fires. The Journal of Environmental Management paper was authored by researchers from the University of Wollongong, USGS and Conservation Biology Institute as part of the Southern California Wildfire Risk Project.

Researchers used 29 years of historical fire mapping to quantify the relationship between annual wildfire area and previous fire area in seven California counties: San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura, Los Angeles, Riverside, Orange and San Diego.

These data were used to measure “leverage” -- reduction in future area burned resulting from one unit of prescribed fire treatment. For example, leverage for tropical savannas like the Serengeti is 1, where one unit of future area burned area can be directly inhibited by one unit of prescribed fire area. In Australian eucalyptus forests, the leverage is around 0.25, where 3 to 4 units of prescribed fire area is needed to inhibit subsequent fire area by 1 unit. 

The leverage for central/southern California was found to be zero, which meant that no amount of area burned can inhibit future area burned. Researchers think this is for two reasons. First, southern California fires are not dependent on fuel age. The Santa Ana wind-driven extreme fires of the region will burn through vegetation of any age, and the growing acreage of easily burned, nonnative grasses also contributes to fire spread. Second, because only a random 2% of the vegetation burns each year on average, the chances of a prescribed fire patch being encountered by a fire are low.

A fire near Lake Elsinore, California. --Photographer: Jon Keeley/USGS
Prescribed fires in central and southern California do not reduce future area burned, as they might in other ecosystems. Image credit: Jon Keeley/USGS




The following files are related to this product:
Some files associated with this product may require the ability to read Portable Document Format (PDF) documents; the latest version of Adobe Reader or similar software is required to view it. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge.
FileFileSize
WERC PubBrief 201211 Keeley - SoCal Leverage.pdf576,350 Bytes




This product is associated with the following project:
Southern California Wildfire Risk Scenario Project

Management Implications
  • Based on past data, prescribed fires in coastal southern California have no effect on reducing area burned by future fires.
  • Prescribed fire may have more impact with management strategies designed to reduce ignitions, or to encourage planning decisions that minimize the spread of fires into urban environments.
  • Regional planners seeking to reduce fire hazard risk may need to investigate other management strategies, such as ignition prevention and invasive plant management.


Bookmark and Share

Share


Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
Page Contact Information: webmaster@werc.usgs.gov

References to non-U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) products do not constitute an endorsement by the DOI.

* DOI and USGS link policies apply.